Ostatni bastion umysłu

Ostatni bastion umysłu

  • Downloads:7467
  • Type:Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
  • Create Date:2021-08-13 09:54:53
  • Update Date:2025-09-06
  • Status:finish
  • Author:Garry Kasparov
  • ISBN:8366575780
  • Environment:PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle

Summary

Jeśli spodobała ci się powieść Gambit królowej Waltera Tevisa lub oparty na niej serial Netfliksa, to powinieneś koniecznie sięgnąć po Ostatni bastion umysłu arcymistrza szachowego Garriego Kasparowa, specjalnego konsultanta wspomnianego serialu!

To pasjonująca opowieść o szachach i apoteoza postępu technologii, napisana przez człowieka, któremu technologia zagroziła końcem kariery。 Przeczytaj o grze mistrzów, psychologii szachowych zmagań, inteligencji (ludzkiej i sztucznej), a także o niesamowitych kulisach najsłynniejszych pojedynków człowieka z maszyną: dwóch meczach szachowych Kasparow – IBM Deep Blue。

***

Mecz szachowy, który w 1997 roku Garri Kasparow rozegrał z superkomputerem IBM Deep Blue, był przełomowym momentem w historii technologii。 Wyznaczył początek nowej ery – ery sztucznej inteligencji。 Oto maszyna pokonała człowieka – i to aktualnego mistrza świata w dyscyplinie wymagającej największej sprawności intelektualnej! Dotarcie do tego etapu zajęło ludzkości ponad sto lat。

W swojej wyjątkowej książce Kasparow po raz pierwszy ujawnia własną – zaskakującą, a może nawet szokującą – wersję tamtych wydarzeń。 Opisuje, jak się czuł, obmyślając strategię przeciw nieustępliwemu, niezmordowanemu przeciwnikowi w sytuacji, gdy oczy całego świata śledziły jego poczynania。 Opowiada o historii sztucznej inteligencji z perspektywy mikrokosmosu szachów – gry uważanej przez pokolenia naukowców za klucz do zrozumienia mechanizmów poznania ludzkiego i maszynowego。 Kasparow, korzystając ze swoich wyjątkowych doświadczeń, wybiega w przyszłość i przedstawia sztuczną inteligencję jako wspaniałą szansę rozwoju człowieka。 Podczas gdy wielu wciąż widzi w niej zagrożenie, w szczególności jeśli chodzi o wpływ na rynek pracy, Kasparow pokazuje, jak ludzkość zamiast obawiać się swoich najbardziej wyrafinowanych wytworów intelektu, może przy ich pomocy wznieść się na nieosiągalne dotąd wyżyny。

Download

Reviews

Miguel Garzón

Siento pereza cuando escucho predicciones genéricas sobre el futuro de labios de autoproclamados gurús。 No siento ningún interés por las opiniones de Kaspárov sobre inteligencia artificial en abstracto。 Me interesa la parte de la evolución de la computación para enseñar a las máquinas a aprender a jugar ajedrez y su experiencia en sus duelos contra ellas antes de que rebasaran la competencia de los mejores grandes maestros humanos。Interesante en lo que el autor domina, especulativo y prescindibl Siento pereza cuando escucho predicciones genéricas sobre el futuro de labios de autoproclamados gurús。 No siento ningún interés por las opiniones de Kaspárov sobre inteligencia artificial en abstracto。 Me interesa la parte de la evolución de la computación para enseñar a las máquinas a aprender a jugar ajedrez y su experiencia en sus duelos contra ellas antes de que rebasaran la competencia de los mejores grandes maestros humanos。Interesante en lo que el autor domina, especulativo y prescindible en las conjeturas generales, en mi opinión。 。。。more

Praveen Choudhary

Fascinating story of man versus machine rivalry, although this one is only focused on chess and how deep blue (IBM machine) beat the reigning champion Gary Kasparov (author) in 1997。The book is an easy read and you can skim majority of the book。 It starts getting interesting towards the end。

Qinyi

It's strangely humbling to get a glimpse into Kasparov's insights into his chess matches。 His genius comes so effortlessly and naturally that you almost take it for granted。 Also chess moves sound really exotic and awesome。 I'm still a chess noob, but this book definitely did more than "Queen's Gambit" to get me to take up chess。 So chess is portrayed as the representation of intelligence, and Kasparov is universally agreed to be one of the top chess players in the history of the game。 Kasparov' It's strangely humbling to get a glimpse into Kasparov's insights into his chess matches。 His genius comes so effortlessly and naturally that you almost take it for granted。 Also chess moves sound really exotic and awesome。 I'm still a chess noob, but this book definitely did more than "Queen's Gambit" to get me to take up chess。 So chess is portrayed as the representation of intelligence, and Kasparov is universally agreed to be one of the top chess players in the history of the game。 Kasparov's final match with IBM's Deep Blue was a historic, watershed moment for AI development。 It pitted human creativity and our analogical thinking against a machine's tactical prowess。 Kasparov lost (though there were many sketchy factors at play since IBM was the match organizer AND participant) - what does his loss mean for the future of chess and for the future of intelligence, human or AI? Kasparov reaches the really interesting conclusion that we should combine our own skills of strategic, pattern-seeking thinking with AI's tactical, data-driven calculations。 I say this is interesting because, well, who has more of a reason to despise, even fear, AI? I mean, a machine almost put Kasparov out of a job。 He certainly has his caveats about the adoption of tech in chess, but at the end of the day, you get the sense that this man is a true disciple of scientific innovation。"The earlier on in the development tree you look, the bigger the potential for disruption is, and the more work it will take to achieve。 If we only rely on our machines to show us how to be good imitators, we will never take that next step to becoming creative innovators。""As for IBM, the lengths they went to to win were a betrayal of fair competition, but the real victim of this betrayal was science。" 。。。more

Dustin

Fascinating with amazing anecdotal insight, and I think the more philosophical insights were interesting, but it didn't feel cohesive, & was rather boring when diving into some of the technical specifics。 Not Herman Melville specific, but a little too into the weeds at times。 Fascinating with amazing anecdotal insight, and I think the more philosophical insights were interesting, but it didn't feel cohesive, & was rather boring when diving into some of the technical specifics。 Not Herman Melville specific, but a little too into the weeds at times。 。。。more

Athanasios Antonakoudis

It is very interesting! Especially if you are interested in AI and chess, however after a certain point it really focuses on chess and the match between Garry and deep blue, which can be a bit tedious。 Very interesting nonetheless

Kamil

Kasparov okumalarına devam。 "Derin düşünce" kitabında eski dünya satranç şampiyonu Garry Kasparov, şampiyon olduğu 1985 yılından itibaren satranç bilgisayarları ile yaptığı maçları irdeliyor。 Bilgisayarların gelişim hızının ne kadar muazzam olduğunu sadece satranç açısından baktığımızda bile görmemiz mümkün。 Öyle ki, 1985 yılında Kasparov 32 bilgisayar ile simültane ( eş zamanlı) oyunda 32' sini birden yenebiliyor。 1996 yılındaki meşhur maçta ise IBM' in geliştirdiği süper bilgisayar "Deep Blue" Kasparov okumalarına devam。 "Derin düşünce" kitabında eski dünya satranç şampiyonu Garry Kasparov, şampiyon olduğu 1985 yılından itibaren satranç bilgisayarları ile yaptığı maçları irdeliyor。 Bilgisayarların gelişim hızının ne kadar muazzam olduğunu sadece satranç açısından baktığımızda bile görmemiz mümkün。 Öyle ki, 1985 yılında Kasparov 32 bilgisayar ile simültane ( eş zamanlı) oyunda 32' sini birden yenebiliyor。 1996 yılındaki meşhur maçta ise IBM' in geliştirdiği süper bilgisayar "Deep Blue" ya yeniliyor。 Kasparov sadece bilgisayar ve yapay zeka konusunu değil, insan psikolojisini, bu tip maçlardaki zayıflık ve kuvvetlerini ve özellikle çok büyük ödüllü maçlarda dönen dolapları da ele alıyor。。。Satranç, bilgisayar ve yapay zeka ile ilgilenenlerin büyük bir keyifle okuyacağı bir eser。 。。。more

Reema

A very informative read that gave me more insight into both the chess and the AI world in the 1990s。 Although I think the idea was great, it was a bit repetitive and Garry did seem to still hold a grudge on that fateful match。 I wouldn’t blame him but he kept saying how amazing that match was in the beginning and when he discusses it in more details he becomes a lot more angry at IBM。 With good reason。 Enjoyable overall but really repetitive, it gave us a good view of chess as technology boomed A very informative read that gave me more insight into both the chess and the AI world in the 1990s。 Although I think the idea was great, it was a bit repetitive and Garry did seem to still hold a grudge on that fateful match。 I wouldn’t blame him but he kept saying how amazing that match was in the beginning and when he discusses it in more details he becomes a lot more angry at IBM。 With good reason。 Enjoyable overall but really repetitive, it gave us a good view of chess as technology boomed in 90s but I was expecting more talk about the present day (2018)。 。。。more

Kek

Being the best player in the chess history, Kasparov offered his thoughts into a variety of topics spanning artificial intelligence, potential impacts of technological advance to humankind, human cognition, and many others, through the lens of chess playing。 The author did have some unique and interesting perspectives to offer on those topics。 However, the book is so poorly structured that reading through chapters after chapters of his reflection of playing against Deep Blue, interspersed with h Being the best player in the chess history, Kasparov offered his thoughts into a variety of topics spanning artificial intelligence, potential impacts of technological advance to humankind, human cognition, and many others, through the lens of chess playing。 The author did have some unique and interesting perspectives to offer on those topics。 However, the book is so poorly structured that reading through chapters after chapters of his reflection of playing against Deep Blue, interspersed with his comments on those changing topics mentioned above, often led me lost。 。。。more

Shamil Tajuddin

Provides great insight on the advancement of chess machines, the professional chess realm, and puts fears regarding automation (technology surpassing humans) into perspective

Vlad Yunger

The book is a good summary of the evolution of computer chess from the perspective of the person who was it's public casualty。 Gary describes how Deep Blue evolved over time。 It was interesting to me how much human influence and calibration went into the machine。 Apparently, the machine is updated with "book" that guides it through the early game。 Computers can calculate millions of moves per second and have a almost perfect blunder accuracy but Gary also describes the emotional tolls that compe The book is a good summary of the evolution of computer chess from the perspective of the person who was it's public casualty。 Gary describes how Deep Blue evolved over time。 It was interesting to me how much human influence and calibration went into the machine。 Apparently, the machine is updated with "book" that guides it through the early game。 Computers can calculate millions of moves per second and have a almost perfect blunder accuracy but Gary also describes the emotional tolls that competative chess takes。 The pressure and stress as well as pure physical exhaustion。 None of these things impact the computer in the slightest and than makes as much of a difference as anything else。 Gary also talks about the future of AI and recommends to embrace the advancements in technology。 In the conclusion he describes a chess variant where each player can use a chess computer to help with making the moves。 He suggests that bridging computers and people is the future。 Perhaps he is a fan of Musk's Neuralink project。 。。。more

kiubert

Ultimamente he estado algo obsesionado con el ajedrez, probablemente por culpa del algoritmo de youtube luego del boom posterior a gambito de dama, que revolucionó la escena online de streamers del juego, que había empezado a expandirse por el vuelco a lo online por la pandemia。Bueno, la cosa es que me enteré de este libro de Kasparov en una entrevista por streaming con el GH Hikaru Nakamura, y ya que también hablaba de inteligencia artificial (que es otra de mis obsesiones recientes), decidí ec Ultimamente he estado algo obsesionado con el ajedrez, probablemente por culpa del algoritmo de youtube luego del boom posterior a gambito de dama, que revolucionó la escena online de streamers del juego, que había empezado a expandirse por el vuelco a lo online por la pandemia。Bueno, la cosa es que me enteré de este libro de Kasparov en una entrevista por streaming con el GH Hikaru Nakamura, y ya que también hablaba de inteligencia artificial (que es otra de mis obsesiones recientes), decidí echarle una mirada。En general, es una historia del ajedrez con computadoras, el match contra deep blue (por primera vez contado desde su perspectiva, ya que como cuenta a lo largo del libro, es un mal perdedor y pasó picado un tiempo), y que significa el desarrollo tecnológico para él, que se hizo famoso a nivel mundial por ser el primer campeón mundial en perder en ajedrez clásico contra una máquina。En cuanto a su evaluación del desarrollo tecnológico, es muy optimista respecto de las posibilidades de trabajo colaborativo entre creatividad humana y fuerza bruta de cálculo, muy determinista y creyente en el progreso tecnológico, cosas con las que se puede entrar en duda。De todos modos, es una narración entretenida, y se puede apreciar aún sin estar tan metido en el tema ajedrez, aunque obvio que le da una capa extra de disfrute。 。。。more

Akarsh Yadav

Usually authors abstain from writing their heart out, when one is mostly brash with opinions。 Although, that might come across as distasteful to read but I had gathered it to be more insightful。 Kasparov is one such personality who seems to speak or write without thinking first。 This book, at some places lead me to believe that he was extremely bitter with his experience with Deep Blue and specifically how IBM treated him。 After then I tried to read it through the glasses of someone who has play Usually authors abstain from writing their heart out, when one is mostly brash with opinions。 Although, that might come across as distasteful to read but I had gathered it to be more insightful。 Kasparov is one such personality who seems to speak or write without thinking first。 This book, at some places lead me to believe that he was extremely bitter with his experience with Deep Blue and specifically how IBM treated him。 After then I tried to read it through the glasses of someone who has played chess。 This 'sport' is indeed torturous when on the losing side and can involve emotions from all spectrum。Apart from his own adventures with AI induced Chess engines, he let out quite a lot of vital points of why Humans + Technology is more beneficial than the usual and more drama driven 'Technology will kill humans' stuff。 。。。more

Aaron Nielsen

The primary scene of this book is Kasparov’s epic battle with IBM’s Big Blue in 1997 in a chess match of human versus computer。 Kasparov uses this match as a metaphor for artificial intelligence in general。 Should AI use a brute force approach or attempt to mimic human thought? Chess engines have tried both approaches with varying levels of success。 Fun, engaging read that makes me want to take up playing chess again。

Andrew Carr

An enjoyable retelling of Kasparov's sparring with Deep Blue (and IBM's somewhat dodgy behaviour), interwoven with some wise insights into how AI is developing, its strengths and limitations。 This is mainly a book about chess, but for those who are well read about AI, there's enough little asides to appreciate it。 An enjoyable retelling of Kasparov's sparring with Deep Blue (and IBM's somewhat dodgy behaviour), interwoven with some wise insights into how AI is developing, its strengths and limitations。 This is mainly a book about chess, but for those who are well read about AI, there's enough little asides to appreciate it。 。。。more

《Maram》

I wasn't expecting this book to be insightful as it was, the conversation about artificial intelligence is striking and prominent in our modern era。 Kasprov brings up important and fascinating discussions that are relevant to our times。 I wasn't expecting this book to be insightful as it was, the conversation about artificial intelligence is striking and prominent in our modern era。 Kasprov brings up important and fascinating discussions that are relevant to our times。 。。。more

Harshan Ramadass

If you’re like me thinking the thirteenth world chess champion knows a lot about chess and maybe not much else, you’d be mistaken。 Incredible insights into artificial and human intelligence from the guy who lived on the bleeding edge of the revolution。 One of the best books I’ve read!

Emile

I find Kasparov an interesting author。 He gives a good background overview on the split between chess playing computers as a research project hoping to shed light on mechanisms of human thinking vs a pure engineering challenge of how to build the most competitive machine。 Getting stories about the evolution of machine chess tech from his perspective, as they went from toys to dominating the game was fascinating。 And I am especially interested in his discussion of the emerging "computer assisted" I find Kasparov an interesting author。 He gives a good background overview on the split between chess playing computers as a research project hoping to shed light on mechanisms of human thinking vs a pure engineering challenge of how to build the most competitive machine。 Getting stories about the evolution of machine chess tech from his perspective, as they went from toys to dominating the game was fascinating。 And I am especially interested in his discussion of the emerging "computer assisted" tournaments, where human players are free to use whatever technical assistive technologies they want。I find his optimistic tech/economic "grow the economy, improve the tech, forward into the bright future" worldview less compelling, nor does he address it as something he came to after weighing critical arguments。 。。。more

Edward Maddox

So I honestly wanted more chess, but I am not at all disappointed。 Kasparov makes an up close case study of what was a huge professional disappointment to himself。 With the perspective of time, he accepts its inevitability。 Looking at the man vs machine history of chess, culminating in his match with Deep Blue, he examines the growing technological power and weaknesses of machine intelligence。 Extraordinarily revealing is his exploration of the physiology of human decision making that translates So I honestly wanted more chess, but I am not at all disappointed。 Kasparov makes an up close case study of what was a huge professional disappointment to himself。 With the perspective of time, he accepts its inevitability。 Looking at the man vs machine history of chess, culminating in his match with Deep Blue, he examines the growing technological power and weaknesses of machine intelligence。 Extraordinarily revealing is his exploration of the physiology of human decision making that translates to all endeavors—even among the greatest chess world champions, who we might expect to be cold rational actors。 The interface of humanity and these machines is our future; your kids need to read this book! 。。。more

light book

3。5

Mike Lisanke

Great book。。。 exactly what you'd want Garry Kasparov to tell you about Chess, AI/ML Chess Players and especially Deep Blue and what IBM did to sell more computers and move their stock price :-p。 I believe Garry was human in his response to the story (his perception) of the goals and tactics IBM's Deep Blue "team" used to win against the top Grand Master of Chess! I'm adding more Deep Blue insider books to read to give me balance But Garry is The Horse's Mouth as IBM Disassembled (destroyed/kille Great book。。。 exactly what you'd want Garry Kasparov to tell you about Chess, AI/ML Chess Players and especially Deep Blue and what IBM did to sell more computers and move their stock price :-p。 I believe Garry was human in his response to the story (his perception) of the goals and tactics IBM's Deep Blue "team" used to win against the top Grand Master of Chess! I'm adding more Deep Blue insider books to read to give me balance But Garry is The Horse's Mouth as IBM Disassembled (destroyed/killed/terminated) the Deep Blue shortly after beating Garry so the Other witness of what Deep Blue "team" did has been eliminated! :-p 。。。more

Mkrzemi

3,5 😕

Speed Franklin

Excellent review of history of man vs。 chess machine and the story of Deep Blue v。 Kasparov。 AI philosophy and information less good

Dan Burt

4。75 stars。

Nick Quenga

Interesting thoughts about AI and expansion into human fields。 Liked the analogy with John Henry。 There was a large focus on chess (as to be expected), though I'm not sure why this book was rated so highly on the CNOs reading list。 Interesting thoughts about AI and expansion into human fields。 Liked the analogy with John Henry。 There was a large focus on chess (as to be expected), though I'm not sure why this book was rated so highly on the CNOs reading list。 。。。more

Omar Delawar

Readability: Hard ---o- EasyPracticality: Low -o--- HighInsights: Few -o--- ManyLength: Long --o-- ShortOverall: Bad --o-- Amazing

Tomasz Blaszak

Momentami słychać krzyk rozpaczy Kasparowa, nieukojony ból po porażce z Deep Blue。 Ale i mamy tu całą masę ciekawych przemyśleń dotyczących AI, szachów i psychologii sportu。 Choć nadal, jakby chciał się Garri trochę usprawiedliwić。。。

Minh-Tien Tran

My chess hero, talk about his journey of battle with AI, and then discover its limits, and how to work with them。

Jim

An interesting look at artificial intelligence and change through the eyes of a former World Chess Champion and Grandmaster。 While it does give a tinge of bitterness to it the author does a good job of tempering his faults and addressing am interesting topic in am easy to read and understand manner。

Joe

Good for gamers that work with machine learning (that's me)。 For the gaming side, it's interesting to read the experience of such a loss from a historically great player。 Kasparov can be a sore loser。 Anyone who has felt bitter about losing a game will recognize his feelings。 It's reassuring to see that even the great players are stung by their losses。 Kasparov dwells a lot on the emotions of chess, since it's something a computer doesn't experience。There is plenty about how computers and machin Good for gamers that work with machine learning (that's me)。 For the gaming side, it's interesting to read the experience of such a loss from a historically great player。 Kasparov can be a sore loser。 Anyone who has felt bitter about losing a game will recognize his feelings。 It's reassuring to see that even the great players are stung by their losses。 Kasparov dwells a lot on the emotions of chess, since it's something a computer doesn't experience。There is plenty about how computers and machine learning work。 Kasparov is well-read about the subject。 He cites familiar pithy statements about artificial intelligence, then shows how they apply in chess。 For example, he shows how Moravec's paradox (what machines are good at is where humans are weak, and vice versa) applies to chess。 He later cites Picasso's "Computers are useless。 They can only give you answers。" Finally, he cites Larry Tesler's "AI effect" ("intelligence is whatever machines haven't done yet") in the context of how computers play chess differently from people。 I like this last quote。 It shows that we redefine intelligence based on what computers can do。 In a book that I read earlier this year, biologists struggle to define "culture," since we keep learning that animals also demonstrate what we thought was unique to human "culture。" (see The Cultural Lives of Whales and Dolphins)。 The last chapter explains Kasparov's ideas about how education should change based on what computers can do for us now (he says young people need to focus on "creative problem-solving, dynamic collaboration online and off, real-time research, and the ability to modify and make their own digital tools。")Kasparov doesn't delve into the details of the games very much, which is nice, since I barely know enough about chess to follow along。 Readers will struggle if they aren't interested in chess or artificial intelligence though。 Anyone interested in both should take a look。 。。。more

Elizabeth

luckily i like chess and machine learning